<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Netsearch Direct &#187; adsense for domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netsearchdirect.com/blog/tag/adsense-for-domains/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netsearchdirect.com</link>
	<description>Define your web presence.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Google Sued over TypoSquatting on Domain Names can go forward</title>
		<link>http://www.netsearchdirect.com/blog/internet-marketing/google-sued-over-typosquating-on-domain-names-can-go-forward?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-sued-over-typosquating-on-domain-names-can-go-forward</link>
		<comments>http://www.netsearchdirect.com/blog/internet-marketing/google-sued-over-typosquating-on-domain-names-can-go-forward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Sterling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense for domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gougle sued]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typosquating]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netsearchdirect.com/blog/internet-marketing/google-sued-over-typosquating-on-domain-names-can-go-forward.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A FEDERAL COURT HAS RULED that Google can be sued for trademark infringement and cybersquatting for serving ads on sites with domain names that are similar to registered trademarks. 


In the case, golf club manufacturer Vulcan Golf takes aim at Google for its "AdSense for Domains" program, which populates otherwise empty sites with AdSense ads. Vulcan Golf also sued other companies involved in creating and registering the sites, which have names like wwwVulcanGolf.com (without a period between www and Vulcan) and vulcanogolf.com. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judge Blanche Manning of the Northern District Federal Court in Illinois ruled that there was sufficient cause to move forward in the case brought by Vulcan Golf.  For anyone that follows my thoughts on this they might remember that I believe that Google profits from, enables and in part created the typosquatting problem.  Google:</p>
<p>&#8220;pays registrants for its use of the purportedly deceptive domain names &#8230; uses  semantics technology to analyze the meaning of domain names and select revenue  maximizing advertisements and controls and maintains that advertising&#8221;</p>
<p>What was not said is that Google profits from this action.</p>
<p><a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=80753" title="Online Media Daily Reports - Wendy Davis" target="_blank">Online Media Daily Reports &#8211; Wendy Davis </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netsearchdirect.com/blog/internet-marketing/google-sued-over-typosquating-on-domain-names-can-go-forward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

